Jump to content
  • entries
    4
  • comments
    21
  • views
    7985

STATE U...Hate U....DND wag U.....

Journeyman6

Entry posted by Journeyman6 in POLITICS ·

1744 views

 Share

Nakakalungkot! Pagkalipas ng tatlompu't dalawang(32) taon ay winakasan na ang kasunduan ng UP at DND na pinapayagan ang UP campus na mag sagawa ng pag titipon laban man o para man sa gobyerno...Ang rason daw? naging at patuloy pa ring nagiging ''breeding ground'' ito ng mga makakaliwa at komunistang organisasyon! Eh sir paano naman yung diskarte ng mga pulis natin dyan sa mga darating na panahon? Kung baga dyan na nga lang yung masasabi mo na pwede mong sabihin yung kabulukan ng lipunan eh..babawiin nyo pa? beke nemen ser megbege pe esep nye?

Sabihin na natin na'' meron'' talagang nahihikayat yung mga makakaliwa at mga komunista dyan at talagang umaakyat ng bundok! pero paano naman po yung mga talaga namang may ipinaglalaban tulad ng rally para wag itaas yung tuition fee? yung para sa kalikasan? at iba pang -cause oriented groups na wala namang kinalaman sa komunista? 

UP is the only place in the PH with a sufficient space or ground to massively organized towards a certain cause with out any permit and that the police keep thier distance( though spying is real), the media covers the anti-government protest but not the ''other'' protest by non-partisan cause oriented groups. The thing is that if communism is the enemy then take it by the horn and not by the tail. 

Lusubin nyo sila sa bundok at ubusin1 pero hwag naman yung karapatan na nag tipon at sumigaw! BEKENEMENSER!

  • Like 1
 Share

7 Comments

Recommended Comments

  • Members
Storm Trooper
  • Members

With all due respect, again ... we've blown this out of proportion.  Like it or not, UP has to sit down with the DND to resolve this.  

Link to comment
  • Members
Journeyman6
  • Members
1 hour ago, care7441 said:

Academic freedom is still there.. What's the issue?will they close the school... 

Academic freedom is just one factor in the equation.Another issue is the one sided termination of ''a binding'' 32 years agreement between two seperate entity,another issue is the backwards mentality of the government towards free-speech and assembly. You cannot just leave your partner of 32 years just because she is talking too much on how you rule the house if i may put it in a more simple perspective.

Link to comment
  • Members
Journeyman6
  • Members
1 hour ago, Storm Trooper said:

With all due respect, again ... we've blown this out of proportion.  Like it or not, UP has to sit down with the DND to resolve this.  

You may be right. However, the chillling effects that this BRUHAHA is creating will last long after this administration is gone. 

Link to comment
  • Members
Storm Trooper
  • Members
37 minutes ago, Journeyman6 said:

You may be right. However, the chillling effects that this BRUHAHA is creating will last long after this administration is gone. 

Let's set aside the other issues being raised.  Bottom line, officially, what are the reasons for the DND dissolving the agreement?  UP should focus on answering those and nothing more. 

Anything that are not related to the official reasons, are just noise.  Let's simplify the issue; otherwise, if we bring in so many "what if" situations into the discussion, nothing gets resolved.    

Link to comment
  • Members
Journeyman6
  • Members
40 minutes ago, Storm Trooper said:

Let's set aside the other issues being raised.  Bottom line, officially, what are the reasons for the DND dissolving the agreement?  UP should focus on answering those and nothing more. 

Anything that are not related to the official reasons, are just noise.  Let's simplify the issue; otherwise, if we bring in so many "what if" situations into the discussion, nothing gets resolved.    

Then we will be diving in the ocean of ''lies and deception'' if we considers only what the DND is claiming. How can UP answer a simple quetion of ''Are you breeding communism in your campus''? if DND has it all figure out(atleast in thier view it is a big YES already). In my opinion there is no what if in this scenario as all fingers point in one direction which is a systematic silencing of the academe and the people within the institution and beyond. Plain and simple.

Link to comment
  • Members
sugar_d
  • Members

I do not agree with systematic silencing of the academe. It is the academe itself who wants to silence other beliefs. The academe claims and defends academic freedom but they are the ones who are devoid of that. Only leftists have a voice in the academe. If you are a left then you are IN. Centrists and rightists ideas are not welcome and do not have a voice in the academe even if they are the majority.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
×
  • Create New...